Page-

Home

An Introductory Study for SDAs on the Subject of Separation - What about then the following quotes, which appear on the surface to prohibit us from calling the SDA church as Babylon?

Article Index
An Introductory Study for SDAs on the Subject of Separation
Why does God, to begin with, ask us to separate from the wicked?
The history of which nation will the people of God just before the second coming going to repeat?
Did the people of the old Jewish church worship their church more than the God of their church?
Did Christ attempt to expose the rulers of the Jewish church in order to liberate His people from the slavery of the priesthood?
Those who wanted to follow Christ at the time of the Jews had to be gathered out from the Jewish system. Has this been the case with every succeeding generation?
When the religious leaders of the Jewish church were found guilty of rejecting the light of Christ, who was charged guilty of this most serious of sins?
Since we are told in 1SM 406 that God's people in the end times will repeat the history of the Jewish church, did the Jewish church ever become part of fallen Babylon?
But is being a harlot and Babylon one in the eyes of God?
Since the God's church in the end times will face the same destiny of the Jewish church according to 1SM 406, did God give any unconditional promise to the SDA church?
Since God's promises are all conditional it follows that the SDA church was not given any unconditional promise. Is there any SOP in support for such a conclusion?
What if the SDA church is found unfaithful in fulfilling His destined mission? Does God have a back-up plan for such an emergency?
What about then the following quotes, which appear on the surface to prohibit us from calling the SDA church as Babylon?
How do we reconcile the above two quotes with our conclusion that the SDA church has indeed fallen and is now part of fallen Babylon?
Did the Lord's messenger ever predict the downfall of the SDA church? YES!
In spite of the repeated warnings of the Lord's messenger to the SDA leadership to repent and obey God's testimonies, did the leadership reverse their rebellious course?
What is the significance of God's declaration in 1903, just 2 weeks after the end of the GC session, that His presence has left the SDA church?
Based on the above can the honest in heart deny that the SDA church, which was first, declared a harlot (Babylonian) in 1903 has indeed fallen because of her continued and increasing sins, errors, and rejection of truth sent to her from heaven?
How do we know from inspired writings that we are now living just before the 'plagues shall be poured out' and therefore have to separate from the fallen Babylonian SDA church and the other churches as well?
All Pages

Page 13 of 19

What about then the following quotes, which appear on the surface to prohibit us from calling the SDA church as Babylon?

“To claim that the Seventh-day Adventist Church is Babylon, is to make the same claim as does Satan, who is an accuser of the brethren, who accuses them before God night and day”. {TM, p 43- 1893}.

“If those who have been proclaiming the message that the church is Babylon had used the money expended in publishing and circulating this error, in building up, instead of tearing down, they would have made it evident that they were people whom God is leading”. {TM, p43- 1893}.

<< Prev - Next >>

< Prev		Next >