Print

Hard Facts

This is a non-WLC article. When using resources from outside authors, we only publish the content that is 100% in harmony with the Bible and WLC current biblical beliefs. So such articles can be treated as if coming directly from WLC. We have been greatly blessed by the ministry of many servants of Yahuwah. But we do not advise our members to explore other works by these authors. Such works, we have excluded from publications because they contain errors. Sadly, we have yet to find a ministry that is error-free. If you are shocked by some non-WLC published content [articles/episodes], keep in mind Proverbs 4:18. Our understanding of His truth is evolving, as more light is shed on our pathway. We cherish truth more than life, and seek it wherever it may be found.


hard facts boulder


“There is some warrant for asserting that the propensity to believe evident nonsense increases rather than decreases with higher education.”1

“That the God of our Lord Yahushua Christ, the Father of glory, may give to you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him; the eyes of your understanding being enlightened, so that you will know what is the hope of his calling, what are the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints” (Eph. 1:17-18).

Unfortunately, few are willing to forgo the acceptance of their peers and make a stand for what they suspect to be true in their own minds, but rather they imagine ignorance or embrace “mystery” to salve a troubled conscience and agree with the crowd.

We have come to the firm personal conclusion that no amount of bluster or scholarly waffle about “wasting Yahuwah’s time” can hide the fact from a reasonable mind that some things believed by churchgoers are in fact nonsense. The sordid history of orthodoxy does not do honor to the Name of the One they claim to know and teach. Therefore, one has only to apply Yahushua’s test, that one does not draw sweet water from a polluted well or grapes from a thorn bush. Unfortunately, few are willing to forgo the acceptance of their peers and make a stand for what they suspect to be true in their own minds, but rather they imagine ignorance or embrace “mystery” to salve a troubled conscience and agree with the crowd. Truth then fails!

It is easier for Christians to go along with popular opinion, as was ably explained by the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860): “There is no opinion, however absurd, which men will not readily embrace as soon as they can be brought to the conviction that it is generally adopted.”

An example of the sort of dogma that is proclaimed by orthodoxy to keep the unlearned “in submission” goes like this: “The Son of Yahuwah died; it is absolutely to be believed because it is absurd. And he was buried and rose again; the fact is certain because it is impossible.”2 That sort of argument must be either blindly believed (“by faith”) or thrown out as nonsense, which unfortunately, most of the world do. The Bible never speaks like this, but yes, the Son of Yahuwah (not Yahuwah the Son) did die and his Father raised him from the dead and exalted him. In plain language, see Acts 2:14-36.

Even Albert Einstein gave homage to Isaac Newton, the great physicist and theologian who perceived Yahuwah’s hand in Creation and refused to confess the Trinity; therefore many of Newton’s theological works are kept unavailable to the public. Newton wrote that “the human race is prone to mysteries, and holds nothing so holy and perfect as that which cannot be understood,” but advised that “Truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and not in multiplicity and confusion of things.” How true!

William Tyndale
William Tyndale

William Tyndale said that scholars who argued about the meanings behind the apparent meaning of words were “idle disputers and brawlers about vain words, ever gnawing on the bitter bark without and never attaining the sweet pith within.” To Tyndale, the Bible is to be read as a whole, and the words accepted for what they are, “for it tells a tale that any man or woman can understand, without being ordained, or studying theology.” Not long before the Church burnt Tyndale for his faith he wrote, “Cleave fast to the rock of the help of Yahuwah and commit the end of all things to Him” and “Be not overcome by men’s persuasions.”3

Isaac Watts, the great logician and hymn writer (“When I Survey the Wondrous Cross,” “Joy to the World,” “O Yahuwah, Our Help in Ages Past” and over 500 more), pointed out in his classic textbook on logic, “The power of reasoning was given us by our Maker, for this very end, to pursue truth; and we abuse one of His richest gifts if we basely yield up to be led astray by any of the meaner powers of nature or the perishing interests of this life. Reason itself, if honestly obeyed, will lead us to receive the divine revelation of the Gospel, where it is duly proposed, and this will show us the path to life everlasting.”4

It is evident that there is a close connection between Isaac Watts’ study of logic and his rejection of the Trinity. After devoting 20 years to intense scriptural study on the nature of Yahuwah, Watts wrote: “But how can such weak creatures ever take in so strange, so difficult and so abstruse a doctrine as this [the Trinity], in the explication and defence whereof multitudes of men, even men of learning and piety, have lost themselves in infinite subtleties of dispute and endless mazes of darkness? And can this strange and perplexing notion of three real persons going to make up one true God be so necessary and so important a part of that Christian doctrine, which, in the Old Testament and the New, is represented as so plain and so easy, even to the meanest understandings?”5

In the light of the foregoing, my question is: On what grounds does an organization claiming to be Bible-based and “Christ-centered” uphold doctrine never mentioned by Yahushua or the Apostles, unless it follows the Roman creed of inerrancy and superiority of the Church’s teaching and tradition over the Bible? To be honest before Yahuwah you must answer that question and act.

Consider these passages. Read them as they are; don’t try and “interpret” them according to some preconceived doctrine:

Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Yahushua Christ, whom you have sent.

Yahushua prays: “Father, the time has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you. For you granted him authority over all people that he might give eternal life to all those you have given him. Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Yahushua Christ, whom you have sent. [“Sent” does not suggest “from heaven”, John the Baptist and the prophets where all “sent.” It means “commissioned.”] I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do” (John 17:2-4, NIV).

The words in bold are strange statements between co-equal, co-eternal beings!

“Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and declared to them...‘Men of Israel, listen to these words: Yahushua of Nazareth, a man approved of Yahuwah among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which Yahuwah did by him in your midst...being delivered by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of Yahuwah, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put him to death, but Yahuwah raised him up, putting an end to the agony of death...This Yahushua Yahuwah raised up, to which we are all witnesses. Therefore having been exalted to the right hand of Yahuwah, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured forth this which you both see and hear...Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that Yahuwah has made that same Yahushua, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ” (Acts 2:14- 36).

Later Stephen testified: “But being full of the Holy Spirit, he gazed intently into heaven and saw the glory of Yahuwah, and Yahushua standing at the right hand of Yahuwah; and he said, ‘Behold, I see the heavens opened up, and the Son of man standing at the right hand of Yahuwah...They went on stoning Stephen as he called on the Lord and said, ‘Lord Yahushua, receive my spirit!’ Then falling on his knees, he cried out with a loud voice, ‘Lord, do not hold this sin against them!’ Having said this, he fell asleep” (Acts 7:55-60).

Hear, O Israel! Yahuwah our Elohim is one. (Deut. 6:4)

And there are many more such clear statements in Scripture that exclude any idea of Yahushua being Yahuwah or of Yahuwah being three Persons:


1Peter Berger, A Far Glory: The Quest of Faith in an Age of Credulity, Free Press, 1992, p. 163.
2
E.G. Bewkes, The Western Heritage of Faith and Reason, Holt, Rinehart, 1971.

3
From William Tyndale: If God Spare My Life by Brian Moynahan.

4
Logic, first published in 1724, reprinted by Soli Deo Gloria Publications, Morgan, PA, 1996, p. 325.

5
Quoted in William G. Eliot, Discourses on the Doctrines of Christianity, American Unitarian Assn., 1877, pp. 97, 100.


This is a non-WLC article written by Keith Relf.

We have taken out from the original article all pagan names and titles of the Father and Son, and have replaced them with the original given names. Furthermore, we have restored in the Scriptures quoted the names of the Father and Son, as they were originally written by the inspired authors of the Bible. -WLC Team