|
This is a non-WLC article. When using resources from outside authors, we only publish the content that is 100% in harmony with the Bible and WLC current biblical beliefs. So such articles can be treated as if coming directly from WLC. We have been greatly blessed by the ministry of many servants of Yahuwah. But we do not advise our members to explore other works by these authors. Such works, we have excluded from publications because they contain errors. Sadly, we have yet to find a ministry that is error-free. If you are shocked by some non-WLC published content [articles/episodes], keep in mind Proverbs 4:18. Our understanding of His truth is evolving, as more light is shed on our pathway. We cherish truth more than life, and seek it wherever it may be found. |
One day, I was deeply discussing with my Jewish friend when he exclaimed in an exasperated tone, “Your Yahushua can’t be the Messiah because there is no peace in the world!”
I responded that Yahushua came the first time to provide atonement for our sins in fulfillment of Scripture’s prophecies of the Suffering Servant—and that He will soon come again to judge the world in righteousness and bring in the promised age of peace and justice.
My friend challenged me, “Where did you get this idea of a ‘Second Coming’? Was it because Yahushua failed the first time that he needed another try? The Bible doesn’t say anything about the Messiah coming twice.”
Perhaps my friend had been reading Rabbi Kaplan’s book, The Real Messiah? which states, “The main task of the Messiah was to bring the world back to Yahuwah and to abolish all war, suffering and injustice from the world. Clearly, Yahushua did not accomplish this. In order to get around this failure, Christians invented the doctrine of the ‘Second Coming.’ All the prophecies that Yahushua did not fulfill the first time are supposed to be taken care of the second time around. However the Jewish Bible offers absolutely no evidence to support the Christian doctrine of a ‘Second Coming.’”
This is a traditional Jewish response to whether Yahushua could be the promised Messiah. It is obvious that there has not been universal peace in the days since Yahushua came—but does this necessarily mean that Yahushua is not the Messiah prophesied in the Jewish Bible? Let’s consider the question.
If we look at rabbinic tradition, we can see that the rabbis, too, have had difficulties with this issue. Although the prophets painted a clear picture of the Messiah reigning and bringing about the redemption of Israel, the end of the war and universal knowledge of Yahuwah (Isaiah 2:1-4, Isaiah 11:1-9, Ezekiel 40-48, Daniel 2:44, Zechariah 14), there is another set of prophecies that speak of the Messiah suffering as an atonement for sin (Psalm 22, Isaiah 52:13-53:12, Daniel 9:25-26, Zechariah 12:10). How do the rabbis reconcile these two seemingly contradictory depictions of Messiah?
One intriguing possibility, traced to the third or fourth century CE, is that there are two Messiahs—one called “Messiah son of Joseph,” who suffers and dies; the other called “Messiah son of David,” who rules and reigns. The suffering Messiah is named “Son of Joseph” because He suffers rejection and humiliation like Joseph in Egypt (Genesis 37-41). The reigning Messiah is named “Son of David” because He reigns in triumph like King David.
So are there two Messiahs—or do the Prophets describe the same Messiah coming on two different occasions with two different aims? Let us examine the latter view.
The accounts of Yahushua’s life in the New Testament conclude that He is the Messiah who fulfills all the prophecies. The New Testament writers also teach that Yahushua will come again in person at some unspecified date in the future. The New Testament, therefore, teaches two comings of the same Messiah. This is not just an incidental doctrine but is integral to the whole message of the New Testament.
This does not imply that Yahushua failed the first time and is returning to try again. Instead, it points to different aims for each coming. Yahushua fulfilled the Messianic prophecies of the Suffering Servant through His sacrifice to atone for the world's sins. He fulfilled other Messianic prophecies as well: He was born to a virgin (Isaiah 7:14) in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2), and He preached a message of good news to the poor, bringing release to those in captivity to sin and sickness (Isaiah 61:1-2). He was executed as a transgressor—although without sin Himself—prayed for those responsible for His death, was buried in a rich man’s tomb, and rose again from the dead on the third day (Psalm 22, Isaiah 53, Zechariah 12:10, Psalm 16:8-11).
When the Messiah Yahushua returns in power and glory, He will be revealed as the longed-for Messiah, Son of David. He will end the conflict raging over Jerusalem, threatening the world with destruction (Zechariah 12-14, Revelation 16-19). He will destroy the world system responsible for corruption and wickedness on earth and for the end-time tribulation (Jeremiah 51, Revelation 18), and He will set up a godly kingdom from Jerusalem, bringing peace and justice to the nations of the world (Isaiah 2:1-4, Revelation 20:4-6).
The fact that Yahushua did not bring lasting peace at His first coming does not disprove the possibility that He is indeed the promised One of Israel. Instead, it is part of Yahuwah’s plan that Messiah would come once to die for our sins, bringing salvation and forgiveness to all who believe, and later return as Judge and King. The view of two comings of Messiah with two distinct aims as described in the New Testament fits perfectly with the two distinct “portraits” of the suffering and reigning Messiah found in the Hebrew Scriptures.
Yahushua Himself stated that His first coming was not the “end of the story.” He said,
“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled” (Matthew 5:17-18).
There is one Messiah who would come twice—and that Second Coming could be very soon!
This is a non-WLC article by Tony Pearce.
We have taken out from the original article all pagan names and titles of the Father and Son, and have replaced them with the original given names. Furthermore, we have restored in the Scriptures quoted the names of the Father and Son, as they were originally written by the inspired authors of the Bible. -WLC Team