“Watching, Waiting, Working” is our Motto!
We are a team of non-denominational volunteers dedicated to sharing the last message of mercy given in the Bible and the wonderful news of the return of Yahushua at the time known only to Yahuwah. We started this online ministry in 2004 as a result of years of prayer and research.
The Bible is our rule of faith and striving to obey the promptings of Yahuwah’s Spirit and the teachings of His word inspires us to call attention to its truths. We believe that Yahuwah does indeed reveal Himself to all those who search for Him with all their heart (Jeremiah 29:13).
We are distraught at the many denominations that exist today claiming to follow the Bible. The fact is, if we all have one reference, we should all have one basic belief. We believe that “there is no other ekklesia than the assembly of those who have the word of Yahuwah and who are purified by it.” This is why we encourage all to study their Bible. The word of Yahuwah is the only safe guard against deception. Without the Bible the way is opened for minds to be deceived. The great controversy of this earth has been between Yahuwah’s law and the traditions of men, the pending question is, ‘Will we obey Yahuwah or man?’
If you see anything on our website that contradicts the Bible, please point it out and we promise to view it with an open mind and heart. We will test whatever you send by the Bible test. If we have erred, it has been on the side of love for our brothers and sisters in humanity and conviction of duty to Yahuwah.
Yahuwah is so good, so loving, that He has revealed Himself in His word and has given us His prophetic word to help His children prepare. Praise Yahuwah!
Why the name: World’s Last Chance®
The name “World’s Last Chance” was chosen for our website because it reflects our belief that Yahushua’s return can be at any time and the world’s inhabitants, most of whom do not live beyond 100 years, are fast running out of this relatively short time span to accept Heaven’s final invitation of grace and mercy. When Adam and Eve sinned, a second chance was graciously granted the human race. Yahushua’s death, burial, and resurrection guarantees every human being the opportunity to choose for themselves whether they will be loyal to their Maker or join Satan in rebellion. The WLC Team is convinced that Yahushua will return in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory to set up Yahuwah’s everlasting kingdom on earth! This is truly the world’s last chance…
“And, behold, I come quickly; and My reward is with Me, to give every man according as his work shall be.” (Revelation 22:12)
Today, if you will hear his voice, harden not your heart. Today is the day of salvation. You may never have another chance.
WLC Headquarters?
Yahushua never had an earthly headquarters and we simply follow His example. Our prayer is that we be found worthy to be numbered among the peculiar group described in Hebrews 11 and 12:18-24.
The WLC team is made up of several members spread literally over the 4 corners of the world. We have an online ministry and our earthly headquarters for the time being is the World Wide Web. We do not highlight nor dwell on any of the team members behind the humble ministry of WLC. Our obsessive focus is on the presenting and sharing of Yahuwah’s truth and light. We wish to draw attention only to Yahuwah and Yahushua, our Founders, Who stand behind all the efforts being undertaken at WLC. Our central office & headquarters therefore, are in New Jerusalem – our eternal destination where we hope to meet every WLC member – at Yahuwah’s appointed time.
If, after viewing any of the content at WLC, His Spirit convicts you to translate it, please Contact us! We are eager for volunteers to help with every language! Thank you!
Disclaimer: Political Neutrality – The content shared on this website is not intended to provide commentary on politics nor does it seek to endorse or condemn any particular political candidate, party, or ideology. Our aim is to keep visitors informed about world events through news articles and updates from various sources. The links we post are solely intended to raise awareness and offer a broad perspective on current affairs. Please note that the views and opinions expressed on the external websites we link to are their own and do not reflect the beliefs, values, or position of this ministry. We remain committed to providing content that encourages open-mindedness and informed decision-making without any political bias or agenda.
World’s Last Chance® and WLC® are both registered Trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Guys this page is just an Israeli intelligence and psychological operation to manipulate and and divide Christian’s and to null the religion itself, joos are creating this page
The creators of this website are humble followers of their Master Yahushua, and servants of the only God, Father Yahuwah.
I mean not more needs to be said here more than the comments that have already been stated. Just a basic common sense non theological question fot WLC members, why do you think that your very fraction of a fraction of a fraction % of “Christians” believe what you believe when all the other denominations that have some theological differences all believe Jesus Christ is the son of God and the belief in the Holy Trinity? How arrogant is it to believe only your tiny little group understands the bible and we are all ij the wrong
The number of believers in what we uphold is never, for us, a determining factor in accepting or rejecting divine light. Our stand is driven by whether what we believe is supported by Scripture. This is the sole criterion that drives our studies and sharing. If a certain understanding is backed by Scripture, we become obligated by His Spirit to share it, even if it leads the whole world to reject it and despise it. We pray that we all remain humble and teachable, so that His Spirit can continue to lead us into the full light of Yahuwah’s truth.
We can prove beyond reasonable doubt that Isaiah 7:14 does not say “virgin” and did not describe a miraculous virgin birth.
What we cannot do (and no historian can) is claim metaphysical certainty. But linguistically and historically, the case is airtight.
1. The Hebrew word used cannot mean “virgin”
The word is עַלְמָה (‘almah)
This is not disputed.
Fact:
‘Almah never means “virgin” in Biblical Hebrew.
Proof:
Hebrew has a specific word for virgin: בְּתוּלָה (betulah)
Isaiah himself uses betulah elsewhere (Isa 23:12; 47:1)
Isaiah deliberately did not use it here
If Isaiah meant “a virgin who has never had sex,” he used the wrong word.
That alone is decisive.
2. Every occurrence of ‘almah in the Hebrew Bible disproves “virgin”
There are 7 occurrences of ‘almah in the Hebrew Bible.
Not one requires virginity.
Example that destroys the virgin claim:
Proverbs 30:19
“the way of a man with an ‘almah”
This is a sexual expression.
A literal virgin reading here is impossible.
If ‘almah meant “virgin,” this verse would be incoherent.
3. Isaiah 7 requires a woman who is already sexually active
Isaiah 7:14 says:
“Behold, the ‘almah is pregnant (or is about to conceive) and will bear a son…”
Key grammar fact:
The Hebrew verb הָרָה (harah) is:
present / imminent
not distant future
not miraculous
This means:
➡️ The woman already exists
➡️ The pregnancy is immediate
➡️ The sign is time-bound
A future virgin birth 700 years later is grammatically impossible.
4. The prophecy has a built-in expiration date
Isaiah 7:15–16:
“Before the child knows to refuse evil and choose good, the land of the two kings you dread will be deserted.”
This happens within a few years, not centuries.
This proves:
The child must be born immediately
The mother must be a known woman
The birth must be ordinary
A virgin birth generations later would make Isaiah’s “sign” meaningless.
5. Isaiah 8 explicitly fulfills the prophecy — naturally
Isaiah 8:3:
“I went to the prophetess, and she conceived and bore a son.”
This is deliberate narrative closure.
Same author
Same timeframe
Same sign-child theme
Same political context
There is no hint of miracle
There is no emphasis on sexual purity
There is no messianic expectation
Isaiah himself shows how the prophecy works.
6. The Greek “virgin” comes from translation, not prophecy
The Septuagint translates ‘almah as παρθένος (parthenos).
Critical fact:
Parthenos does not always mean virgin either.
Genesis 34:3 LXX calls Dinah “parthenos” after she was raped
Greek usage allows “young unmarried woman”
So:
❌ Greek does not prove virginity
❌ Hebrew explicitly avoids virgin language
7. No Jew — ever — read this as a virgin birth before Christianity
This is devastating evidence.
No Second Temple Jewish text
No Dead Sea Scroll
No Targum
No rabbinic source
No messianic expectation
If Isaiah clearly predicted a virgin birth, Jews would have noticed.
They didn’t, because it isn’t there.
8. Matthew reinterprets — he does not “fulfill”
Matthew quotes the Greek, not the Hebrew.
He is doing midrash, not reporting Isaiah’s meaning.
This is theology after the fact, not prediction.
Final verdict (no wiggle room)
What can be proven beyond reasonable doubt:
✅ ‘Almah does not mean virgin
✅ Isaiah knew the word for virgin and did not use it
✅ The prophecy requires a normal birth in Isaiah’s lifetime
✅ The timeline makes a distant miracle impossible
✅ Isaiah 8 narratively completes the sign
✅ The virgin reading is a later Christian reinterpretation
Therefore:
Isaiah 7:14 does not predict a virgin birth — linguistically, grammatically, historically, or contextually.
When pursuing truth, numbers are never factored in. Truth is never popular and is always costly to uphold. The important thing is for us, all of us, to remain humble and teachable, so that Yahuwah’s Spirit can continue to lead and guide us away from error and into His pure truth.
The amount of paradox on this cult page is worst than the Quran !
The number of believers in what we uphold is never, for us, a determining factor in accepting or rejecting divine light. Our stand is driven by whether what we believe is supported by Scripture. This is the sole criterion that drives our studies and sharing. If a certain understanding is backed by Scripture, we become obligated by His Spirit to share it, even if it leads the whole world to reject it and despise it. We pray that we all remain humble and teachable, so that His Spirit can continue to lead us into the full light of Yahuwah’s truth.
Heretics
JESUS IS KING 👑
If sharing the truth brands us as heretics, we embrace being called heretics. To stand with the truth is to stand with the source of truth. What a privilege and honor to be on the side of Father Yahuwah, the one and only true God.
If following the truth renders us as heretics in the eyes of truth rejecters, then we are happy to be declared as heretics.
Let’s think about this Identity Trap for a second. The Almighty God says in Isaiah 44:6, “I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.” Exclusive title, isn’t it? There’s no “First and a Half.” But then we see that this title is also claimed by Jesus in Revelation 1:17-18, “I am the first and the last.” And if there is “beside Him no God,” then Jesus is either that God or He’s a fraud. There cannot be two different beings claiming the same absolute eternal position.
Then there’s the issue of Worship. In a strict Hebrew structure, bowing in worship is exclusive to the Creator. We see Peter and even angels strictly forbidding people from bowing to them (Acts 10:25-26, Rev 22:8-9). But Jesus? He never prohibits anybody from worshiping Him. He allows the leper to worship Him (Matt 8:2), He allows the blind man to worship Him (John 9:38), and He allows the disciples to worship Him after the resurrection (Matt 28:17). He never once prohibits anybody from worshiping Him. If He were not God, that would be blasphemy. But the clincher is in Hebrews 1:6, where the Father Himself commands: ‘And let all the angels of God worship him.’ If you are not willing to believe in the deity of Christ, you are not ‘protecting the Father’s honor’–you are disobeying the Father’s command.
You are getting bogged down in ‘Sacred Names’ and grammatical arguments and are losing sight of the main point. When Thomas says, ‘My Lord and my God’ in response to looking at Jesus in John 20:28, Jesus didn’t explain to him why that statement was ‘technically’ wrong. He commended him on his faith. A finite being cannot bridge an infinite gap. If Jesus is not God, then the cross is a tragedy, not a sacrifice.”
You’re going to hell unless you repent heretics. Jesus is Holy God. He has no beginning and no end.
Sending someone to hell is a divine prerogative. It is not for any mortal to decide another’s fate. But we take your warning seriously; this is why we stand by the truth no matter the size of the opposition. To be on the side of truth is a life calling for us.
Jesus is the Son of God. He is not God. Equating Jesus with God is blasphemy. Yahuwah is God, and Jesus is the human son of Yahuwah. He never referred to himself as God. His preferred and most often quoted title was the Son of Man. You do not honor the Father or the Son when you equalize them and merge these two separate beings into one.
The Holy Spirit of God though Paul on Jesus:
Philippians 2:6
“Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:”
This passage in Philippians is greatly misunderstood. May we invite you to have a look at this article: https://www.worldslastchance.com/articles/winds-of-doctrine/a-reading-of-philippians-25-11/?
YOU SAID THAT JESUS IS NOT PRE-EXIST? LEARN YOUR BIBLE.
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 5 The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome[a] it.
John 1:1-5
the Word means Jesus!
In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and what God was the word was. This word was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through it, and apart from it nothing came into being that has come into being. In it was life, and the life was the light of humankind. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it. There came a man sent from God, whose name was John. This man came as a witness in order to testify about the light, in order that through him all might believe.
(John 1:1-7 REV – Revised English Version)
GOD created the world and everything in it by HIS word – not His Son. Does this diminish Yahushua’s place as our true KING OF KINGS? Absolutely Not! Here is a great and in depth explanation from the REV commentary:
John 1:3
All things came into being through it, and apart from it nothing came into being that has come into being.
“All things were made through it.” The logos is an “it,” not a “him.” God made everything through and according to His logos, His plan and purpose, and with wisdom. The logos was God’s plan and purpose, especially as it was put into action (see commentary on Joh_1:1). Furthermore, it was integrally tied together with His wisdom (see commentary on Joh_1:2).
To understand one reason why most English versions say “him” but others say “it,” we must understand how pronouns are used in languages such as Greek. Unlike English, but like many languages, including Spanish, French, German, Latin, and Hebrew, the Greek language assigns a gender to nouns. Then, grammatically, the gender of any pronoun must match the gender of the associated noun. The gender assignment of nouns happened in ancient antiquity, and often there seems to be no reason why a noun has the gender assigned to it that it does.
In French, for example, a table is feminine, la table, while a desk is masculine, le bureau. Thus a strictly literal translation of a French sentence with nouns and matching pronouns might be, “I like the table, she is just right for the room, but I do not like the desk, he is too big.” In correctly translating from French to English, however, we would never translate the English as, “the table, she,” or “the desk, he.” Not only is it improper English, it misses the point. Even the French people do not think of tables and desks as being masculine or feminine. The gender of the nouns is simply a part of the language that has come down through the ages.
Furthermore, no one would ever insist that a table or desk was a person just because it had a masculine or feminine pronoun associated with it. Good English translators recognize that even though a noun is assigned a gender in another language and the associated pronoun follows the gender of the noun, their job is to bring the meaning of the original into English, not introduce confusion into the English translation. Hence, someone translating from French to English would use the English designation “it” for the table and the desk, in spite of the fact that the original French language called them “she” and “he.”
What is true in the examples from the French language is true in any language that assigns a gender to nouns and then uses pronouns with that same gender. For example, the Greek word for “lamp” is luchnos, a masculine noun, and therefore proper grammar dictates that any pronoun associated with it is masculine. Thus, if the Greek text of Mat_5:15 were translated literally, it would read, “Nor do they light a lamp and place him under the bushel.” However, every English version we checked said, “it,” as proper English dictates.
The same grammatical rule that the pronoun must agree with the noun is followed when the noun is feminine. According to the literal Greek text, Christ told his disciples that when they entered a “city” (polin; a feminine noun) or “village” (kome; a feminine noun), they should “find out who in her is worthy” (Mat_10:11; literally translated). The English versions correctly read, “it” instead of “her.” When translating from another language into English, we have to use the English language properly. Students learning Greek, Hebrew, Spanish, French, German, etc., quickly discover that one of the difficult things about learning the language is memorizing the gender of each noun—something we do not have in the English language.
Once we clearly understand the gender of a pronoun is determined by the gender of the noun, we can see why one cannot build a doctrine on the gender of a noun and it’s agreeing pronoun. Only confusion would result from that kind of erroneous exegesis. In Joh_1:3, the pronoun autou is masculine so it agrees grammatically with the masculine noun logos. Most Trinitarians believe that the logos refers to Jesus Christ, so to them the translation “him” is proper. However, we assert that the logos is not a person, but the plan or purpose of God, and is therefore an “it.”
Historically, Trinitarians have thought of the logos as Jesus Christ, so they have translated the pronoun as “him,” but not every version does that. The first English translation from the Greek text was done by William Tyndale (1494-1536; John Wycliffe translated into English earlier, but used the Latin as his base text). He translated the pronoun as “it,” not “him.” In 1537, the Matthew’s Bible, translated by John Rogers using the pseudonym “Thomas Matthews,” used “it,” not “him.” In 1539, the Great Bible, a revision of Matthew’s Bible, had “it.” This was important because the translation was overseen by Miles Coverdale, and in the Coverdale Bible of 1535, done some years earlier and based on the Latin, Coverdale used “him,” not “it,” but in this later version he apparently switched his preference and used “it.” When Queen Mary forbade the printing of the English Bible, translation moved to Geneva, and the Geneva Bible of 1560 became the household Bible of the English-speaking people. It was the Bible used by Shakespeare, as well as the Puritans who settled New England. Under Queen Elizabeth the English Bible was once again printed in Great Britain, and the Bishop’s Bible was published in 1568. It used “it,” not “him” in Joh_1:3-4, but was never popular with the people. The major change came with the King James Bible, which used “him,” not “it” in the opening of John, and most English versions since then have done the same. Nevertheless, we should be aware that the translation “it” has good literary foundation and a solid Christian history. [For translating the gift of holy spirit as an “it,” see commentary on Joh_14:17].
Although we today should think of the logos as an “it” for clarity, we need to acknowledge that the ancient people personified the concept of the logos and spoke of it as if it was a person, even though they did not believe it was a person. This seems strange to us, but it was perfectly natural for the ancients to use the figure of speech personification to express many concepts (for more on the figure personification, see commentary on Pro_1:20, “Wisdom”). Nevertheless, for us today it makes the text clearer if we say that God had a plan, and God worked through it (not, “him”) to restore the world to Himself.
When you read John’s prelude with today’s understanding of language, you might conclude that the Word is a synonym for Jesus. But this is not how we should study this. Understand what John was trying to communicate. When you read John’s prelude with current linguistic knowledge, you might think that the Word equals Jesus. However, this is not how we should interpret the passage. We need to approach it with the writing style of a first-century Jew, like John. Only then will we truly understand what John was trying to convey. May I invite you to these two links on this very subject?
https://www.worldslastchance.com/articles/biblical-beliefs/the-prologue-to-johns-gospel/
https://www.worldslastchance.com/wlc-radio/john-the-jew-and-the-word-in-john-1/
John 4:40
“But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this.”
What is Jesus referring too?
If Jesus is not eternal who is He speaking of?
How come they didn’t respond to your scripturally based comment. This is so dangerous. People are going to eat this up and fall astray. I pray they really do humble themselves and ask for guidance. The devil is deceptive, sly and cunning. This…this wlc is something he is doing. Just enough . Just enough to plant that doubt . Jesus help us all. Jesus accepts worship, forgives sins and states He and the Father are one. Before Abraham was..I Am. I thought this was jehovas witness. But it’s an entire new deceptive wolf in sheep clothing group teaching abominations. The church must teach and preach and make sure believers are firm in foundational truths. Let the Holy Spirit correct and convict on the matters that truly matter. If you don’t have Jesus , then you don’t have the Holy Spirit, then you are not saved. How on earth do they suppose a human was able to take all the sins of the world and sustain God the Father’s wrath. You have to be divine in order to take the wrath of the divine for all mankind, present and future. I pray their hearts open for the real divine truth. God bless us all.
Cult.
Dear Sister Kristi,
Jesus was the second Adam. He was brought into existence as a sinless, perfect human, just as Adam was. However, although Adam lived in a perfect environment, he still sinned and brought death into the world by disobeying Father Yahuwah.
In contrast, the Second Adam lived in a hostile environment and was severely tested, yet he remained perfect and sinless. Unlike Adam, he remained fully dependent on his Father at all times, which enabled him to maintain his purity and sinlessness.
Because he was a human, he could atone for the sins of all humans—exchanging his righteousness for the sins of all who accept his atoning sacrifice. Only a human could atone for the sins of other humans, and only a perfect human could offer his life as the price paid for the sins of all. A divine being cannot die and therefore cannot atone for the sins of humanity.
A divine being in the flesh died.
Jesus’s flesh died but the his Spirit did not. Then by the Will of God the Father the Holy Spirit raised Jesus’s fleshy body and the and Jesus’s Spirit was restored on the 3rd day. The resurrection.
Jesus the last sacrifice for all sin of mankind Jew and Gentile.
Jesus died because he bore all sin on his Spirit (Spirit of Christ)
and his earthly flesh. When this happened God the Father who is Holy does not know sin. This is why Jesus asked the Father why had thou forsaken me?
Jesus died for ALL SIN for ALL MANKIND throughout the ages.
The followers of Jesus were labeled as cultists by the mainstream religious authorities of that time.
Cousin?
I used to follow your ministry as you taught the Genesis 1:14 / creation calendar. However, I cannot, in good conscience, continue to follow your ministry when it has turned a 180° , and against scripture.
Satan has crept in and deceived you to the core.
I make my prayers to Heavenly Father that you will repent of the evil you are spreading and humbly return to His word in truth.
Dear Sister Kathleen,
We are not encouraging anyone to follow the ministry. We are simply sharing our understanding of the truth and inviting truth-seekers to examine the evidence we provide in support of our positions. Regarding the Godhead, for example, we have 266 items [articles and radio episodes] on this very topic. This extensive collection should demonstrate that we have thoroughly searched for the truth, so we do not risk forfeiting our eternal crowns of glory.
There’s so many contradictions within your own words bud in the intro…
You’re saying there’s only one God (agreed) you say there’s no trinity and that it’s only God, yet you’re rambling on about a heavenly “Son and Father” relationship co-existing ???? sir, that is the trinity hahah and pre-existing Christ.
You’re saying that there’s no rapture, yet you’re stating Jesus return AND second coming..
That was all within the first page
I do agree with the motionless earth- I am a geologist.
Read your Bible.
John 14:6
We strongly believe that we can ONLY reach the Father through His Son, our Master Yahushua.
There is a divine Father, the one and only God. He conceived His human Messiah, Jesus, within the womb of Mary. And Yahuwah’s Spirit is the Holy Spirit. What we uphold is biblical truth. The Trinity is not biblical. It is a product of merging Greek mythology with biblical truth. It took almost four hundred years to establish the Trinity dogma, which was completely unknown and foreign to Jesus and the disciples.
Well, it’s smart Christians know that you are evil. First of all, no one gave you authority to determine who God and Jesus Christ truly is. You don’t speak in the Spirit nor do you have the Holy Spirit. Jesus came 2000 years and gave His life for the Church. He gave authority to His disciples. Only they know what was said and what was meant. No one has Authority other than those He gave it to to determine Truth. You can only get to the weak people who lack Truth like you all, but those people’s souls area probably lost right now anyway. You get people who try to create a God who suits them. That’s not how it works. We must be suitable for Him. I’ll pray for you idiots but you won’t go far. We Win in the end.
We are commanded in Scriptures to examine every teaching so that we do not inadvertently or intentionally espouse error. When we did so in obedience to Scripture, we concluded that we cannot be honest followers of Yahushua and espouse the Trinity doctrine. So, we discarded this unbiblical teaching and replaced it with biblical truth. This process of unlearning error and learning truth took years of study and prayer, and the result is the extensive body of evidence we gladly share with everyone who cares to examine it.
Yes, ultimately, truth prevails. We agree with you on this acknowledgment. Let us all strive to stand with the truth instead of man-made teachings and human traditions.
You are condemning your selves and those who walk with you!
Show us where we have gone wrong according to Scriptures, and we will prayerfully review your evidence. How can we be condemned when we stand for Scriptural truth?