“And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” Matthew 16:18-19.

These words have been variously interpreted: (1) that Peter is “this rock,” (2) that Peter’s faith in Jesus as the Christ is “this rock,” (3) that Christ Himself is “this rock.” Persuasive reasons have been set forth in favor of each of the three explanations. The best way to determine what Christ meant is to inquire of the Scriptures. The testimony of the writings of the disciples will determine the unequivocal truth to what Jesus meant.

By his teachings, Peter emphatically disclaims that the “rock” of which Jesus spoke referred to him (Acts 4:8-12; 1 Peter 2:4-8). Matthew records the fact that Jesus used the same figure of speech to refer to Himself (Matthew 21:42).

From very early times the figure of a rock was used by the Hebrew people as a specific term for God (Deuteronomy 32:4; Psalms 18:2). The prophet Isaiah speaks of Christ as “a great rock in a weary land” (Isaiah 32:2), and as “a precious corner stone, a sure foundation (Isaiah 28:16).

Paul affirms that Christ was the “rock” that went with His people in ancient times (1 Corinthians 10:4). In a secondary sense the truths Jesus spoke are also a “rock” on which men may build safely and securely (Matthew 7:24, 25), for He Himself is the living “Word” “made flesh” (John 1:1, 14).

Jesus Christ is the “rock of our salvation” (Psalms 95:1). He alone is the foundation of the church, for “other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 3:11), “neither is there salvation in any other” (Acts 4:12). Closely associated with Jesus Christ is “the chief corner stone” in the foundation of the church are “the apostles and prophets” (Ephesians 2:20). In the same sense that Christ is the Rock, “a living stone, disallowed indeed of men, but chosen of God,” all who believe in Him, “as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house” (1 Peter 2:4, 5), “fitly framed together… an holy temple in the Lord” (Ephesians 2:21). But Jesus is ever and only the “Rock” on which the entire structure rests, for without Him there would be no church at all. Faith in Him as the Son of God makes it possible for us also to become sons of God (John 1:12; 1 John 3:1, 2). The realization that Jesus Christ is indeed the Son of God, as Peter emphatically affirmed upon this occasion (Matthew 16:16), is the key to the door of salvation. But it is incidental, not fundamental, that Peter was the first to recognize and declare his faith.

Augustine (C. A.D 400), the greatest of Catholic theologians of the early Christian centuries, leaves it for his readers to decide whether Christ here designated Himself or Peter as “the rock” (Retractiones i. 21. 1). Chrysostom, the “golden-tongued” preacher, another Father of the early centuries, says that Jesus promised to lay the foundation of the church upon Peter’s confession [not on Peter], but elsewhere calls Christ Himself truly our foundation (Commentary on Galatians, ch. 1:1-3; Homilies on 1 Timothy, No. xviii, ch. 6:21). Eusebius, the early church historian, quotes Clement of Alexandria as declaring that Peter and James and John did not strive for supremacy in the church at Jerusalem, but chose James the Just as leader (Church History ii. 1). Other early Fathers of the church, such as Hilary of Arles, taught the same.

 It was only when scriptural support was sought in behalf of the claims of the bishop of Rome to the primacy of the church that the words of Christ upon this occasion were taken from their original context and interpreted to mean that Peter was “this rock.” Leo I was the first Roman pontiff to claim (about A.D 445) that his authority came from Christ through Peter. Of him, Kenneth Scott Latourette, a leading church historian, says: “He insisted that by Christ’s decree Peter was the rock, the foundation, the doorkeeper of the kingdom of heaven, set to bind and loose, whose judgments retained their validity in heaven, and that through the Pope, as his successor, Peter continued to perform the assignment which had been entrusted to him” (A History of Christianity [1953], p. 186).

Strange indeed it is that if this is really what Christ mean, neither Peter nor any other of the disciples, nor the other Christians for four centuries thereafter, discovered the fact! How extraordinary that no Roman bishop discovered this meaning in Christ’s words until the fifth-century bishop considered it necessary to find some Biblical support for papal primacy. The significance attributed to Christ’s words, by which they are made to confer primacy upon the so-called successors of Peter, the bishops of Rome, is completely at variance, with all the teachings Christ gave to His followers (Matthew 23:8, 10).

Perhaps the best evidence that Christ did not appoint Peter as the “rock” on which He would build His church is the fact that none of those who heard Christ upon this occasion – not even Peter – so construed His words, either during the time that Christ was on earth or later. Had Christ made Peter chief among the disciples, they would not thereafter have been involved in repeated arguments about which of them “should be accounted the greatest” (Luke 22:24; Matthew 18:1; Mark 9:33-35).

The name of Peter is derived from the Gr. petros, a “stone,” generally a small slab of stone. The word “rock” is the Gr. petra, the large mass of rock itself, a “ledge” or “shelf of rock,” a “rocky peak.” A petra is a large, fixed, immovable “rock,” whereas a petros is a small “stone.” To what extent Christ may have had this distinction in mind, however, or may have explained it as He spoke, is a matter that cannot be determined from these words themselves, because Christ certainly spoke Aramaic – the common language of Palestine at that time. The Gr. petros undoubtedly represents the word kepha’ (cephas) in Aramaic (Matthew 4:18). And, very likely, petra also represents the Aramaic word kepha’, though there is a possibility that Christ used some other synonym or expression in Aramaic, which would agree with the distinction between petros and petra that is made by the gospel writers in Greek. It seems probable that Christ must have intended to make such a distinction, however, or Matthew, writing in Greek and guided by the Holy Spirit, would not have made one.

Obviously a petros, or small stone, would make an impossible foundation for any edifice, and Jesus here affirms that nothing less than a petra , or “rock,” could suffice. This fact is made even more sure by the words of Christ in Matthew 7:24, “Whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them” is like “a wise man, which built his house upon a rock [Gr. Petra].” Any edifice built upon Peter, petros, a weak, erring human being, as the Gospel record makes plain, has a foundation little better than shifting sand.

Now, referring to Matthew 16:19, the “keys” to the kingdom of heaven are the words of Christ (*John 1:12; 17:3). *It is important to note that Christ Himself speaks of the “key” here referred to as “the key of knowledge” of how to enter the kingdom (Luke 11:52). The words of Jesus are “spirit” and life to all who receive them (John 6:63). It is the words of Christ that bring eternal life (John 6:68). The word of God is the key to the new birth experience (1 Peter 1:23).

As the words spoken by Jesus convinced the disciples of His divinity, so their repeating of His words to other men, as His ambassadors, was to “reconcile” them to God (2 Corinthians 5:18-20). The saving power of the gospel is the only thing that admits men and women into the kingdom of heaven. Christ simply bestowed upon Peter and all the other disciples the authority and power to bring men into the kingdom. It was Peter’s perception of the truth that Jesus is indeed the Christ that placed the “keys” of the kingdom in his possession and let him into the kingdom, and the same may be said of all Christ’s followers to the very close of time.

The argument that Christ bestowed upon Peter a degree of authority greater than, or different from, that which He have to the other disciples, is without scriptural basis. As a matter of fact, among the apostles, it was James and not Peter who exercised administrative functions over the early church in Jerusalem (Acts 15:13, 19; 1 Corinthians 15:7; Galatians 2:9, 12). Upon at least one occasion Paul “withstood” Peter “to the face” for a wrong course of action (Galatians 2:11-14), which he certainly would not have done had he known anything about Peter’s enjoying the rights and prerogatives that some now claim for him upon the basis of Matthew 16:18, 19. 

As for the significance of the word “bind,” the entire statement reads, “Whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven.” The meaning evidently is this, that the church on earth will require only what heaven required and will prohibit only what heaven prohibits. This seems to be the clear teaching of the Scriptures (Matthew 7:21-27; Mark 7:6-13). As the apostles went forth to proclaim the gospel, according to the commission entrusted to them (Matthew 28:19, 20), they were to teach converts “to observe all things whatsoever” Christ had commanded—no more and no less.

To extend the meaning of “bind” and “loose” to the authority to dictate what members of the church may believe and what they may do, in matters of faith and practice, is to read into the words of Christ more than He meant by them, and more than the disciples understood by them. Such a claim God does not sanction. Christ’s representatives on earth have the right and the responsibility to “bind” whatever has been “bound in heaven” and to “loose” whatever has been “loosed in heaven,” that is, to require or to prohibit whatever Inspiration clearly reveals. But to go beyond this is to substitute human authority for the authority of Christ (Mark 7:7-9), a tendency that Heaven will not tolerate in those who have been appointed to the oversight of the citizens of the kingdom of heaven on earth.

To summarize the above on Matthew 16:18-19 there are several points to consider:

1.      Peter, to whom these words were addressed, emphatically disclaims by his teachings that the “rock” of which Jesus spoke referred to him.
(Acts 4:8-12; 1 Peter 2:4)

2.      Jesus used the same figure of speech to refer to Himself.
(Matthew 21:42; Luke 20:17)

3.      From very early times the figure of rock was used by the Hebrew people as a specific term for God.
(Deuteronomy 32:4; Psalms 18:2)

4.      Paul affirms that Christ was the Rock.
(1Corinthinas 10:4; 1 Corinthians 3:11)

5.      It is the faith in Jesus that saves.
(John 1:12)

6.      Had Christ made Peter chief among the disciples, they would not thereafter have been involved in repeated arguments about which of them “should be accounted the greatest".
(Luke 22:24, Matthew 18:1)

 

Was Peter the Rock that the church of God was built on? No, here is why:

“And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. Matthew 16:18.

  1. The gates of Hell prevailed against Peter when He allowed Satan to speak through him (Matthew16:22). Then Jesus answered Peter saying "Get thee behind me, Satan thou art an offense unto me" (Matthew.16:23)
  2. The gates of Hell prevailed again against Peter when he thrice denied his Lord (John 18:25).

 

Peter Himself was an erring agent but the church of God was built rather on the faith in Jesus.

Furthermore, the keys to the kingdom of heaven are the words of Christ. It is important to note that Christ Himself speaks of the "key" here referred to as "the key of knowledge" of how to enter the kingdom (see Luke 11:52). The saving power of the gospel is the only thing that admits men and women into the kingdom of heaven. Christ simply bestowed upon Peter and all the other disciples the authority and power to bring men into the Kingdom (through spreading the knowledge). It was Peter's perception of the truth that Jesus is indeed the Christ that placed the 'keys' of the kingdom in his possession and let him into the kingdom, and the same may be said of all Christ's followers to the very close of time.

The argument that Christ bestowed upon Peter a degree of authority greater than or different from that which He gave to the other disciples is without scriptural basis. As a matter of fact, among the apostles it was James and not Peter who exercised administrative functions over the early church in Jerusalem (see Acts 15:13, 1 Corinthians 15:7, Galatians 2:9,12) Upon at least one occasion Paul "withstood" Peter "to the face" for a wrong course of action (see Galatians 2:11-14), which he certainly would not have done had he known anything about Peter's enjoying the rights and prerogatives that some now claim for him.

Comments (1)Add Comment
62882
...
written by icyirene, December 01, 2009
smilies/kiss.gif I can do all things through Christ who gives me strength.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Member Login

Today's Date

29
12
5997
(dd/mm/yyyy)
16
03
2010
May Yahuwah Bless you on this Sabbath day.
Prayer Request