Copernicus & the Hegelian Dialectic

The King James Version (KJV) is mostly used in these lessons. Click here to access the KJV online.

Coincidences of dates, agendas, and goals, connect the Jesuits to a massive deception over the true shape of the earth – all for the purpose of a multi-faceted end time delusion.

Conspiracy. The word has taken a hit in the last 20 years or so. Evidence supporting the existence of conspiracies is frequently dismissed with a sniff as nothing more than a loony theory. But people quick to dismiss circumstantial evidence of evil as nothing more than idle speculation frequently overlook one important point: when there is sufficient evidence to support a theory, it moves from the realm of conjecture and becomes a possibility. Then, a probability. And finally, a fact.

Startling new evidence implicates the Jesuit order as masterminds behind a deception spanning centuries. This article will trace the actions and influence of the Jesuits’ involvement in perpetrating this lie. The purpose has been to change the perception of the masses regarding the earth, the authority of the Bible, the universe and the Creator’s position in it. This change lays the groundwork for the overwhelming delusion shortly to come upon the world under the first woe, or fifth trumpet, prophesied in Revelation 9: demonic “alien” invasion.

Sometimes the evidence is circumstantial. However, circumstantial evidence can be very compelling and should not be dismissed. According to a retired federal judge:

There are, generally speaking, two kinds of evidence, direct and circumstantial. Direct evidence is testimony by a witness about what that witness personally saw or heard or did. Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence, that is, evidence from which you could find that another fact exists, even though it has not been proved directly. There is no legal distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence as far as probative value; the law permits you to give equal weight to both…

There is no reason to be prejudiced against evidence simply because it is circumstantial evidence. …In fact, proof by circumstantial evidence may be as conclusive as would be the testimony of witnesses speaking on the basis of their own observation. Circumstantial evidence, therefore, is offered to prove a certain fact from which you are asked to infer the existence of another fact or set of facts. Before you decide that a fact has been proved by circumstantial evidence, you must consider all of the evidence in light of reason, experience and common sense.¹

“In the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses…more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.

“Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.”

(Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1, Ch. X.)

A globe earth is unproven pseudo-science but is believed worldwide. It is a huge lie that has taken on a life of it’s own, being passed from generation to generation. Anyone who dares question it is mocked and ridiculed. Vladimir Lenin reportedly observed: “A lie told often enough becomes the truth.”

If a person even says the words “flat earth,” the hearer snickers. The erroneous mental image that springs immediately to mind is of a flat plain where, if one isn’t careful, a person could trip and fall off the edge.

Nowhere is this phenomenon seen as clearly as the belief that the earth is a sphere, spinning through space as it revolves around the sun—which itself is hurtling thousands of kilometers an hour through space. If a person even says the words “flat earth,” the hearer snickers. The (incorrect) mental image that springs immediately to mind is of a flat plain where, if one isn’t careful, a person could trip and fall off the edge.

WLC invites you to suspend your belief in a round globe. Carefully study the accumulated evidence for an enclosed earth that is not circling the sun.

It begins with a man…

Nicolaus Copernicus

Copernicus is known for proposing a new and different model of the universe. Prior to Copernicus, most well educated people believed in the Ptolemaic model of the universe, which placed a flat, enclosed earth at the center of the universe. Copernicus suggested that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the solar system and the earth revolved around it. This “heliocentric” model is what is taught today, while the earlier “geocentric” model of everything revolving around the earth has been relegated to the historic dustbin.

Most people are aware that it was for promoting Copernicus’ ideas that Galileo Galilei was persecuted by the Roman Catholic hierarchy less than 100 years after Copernicus’ death. Accused of heresy, Galileo was forced to recant his beliefs and spent the last nine years of his life under house arrest. However, what most people do not know are the following significant facts:

Nicolaus Copernicus, 1473-1543

1. Copernicus belonged to the Third Order of St. Dominic. When he wished to pursue a career in the church, he studied, among other things, astrology and astronomy.
2. While some sources maintain that Copernicus never took the vows of a priest, he was a cleric and never married. Furthermore, “the fact that in 1537 King Sigismund of Poland put his name on the list of four candidates for the vacant episcopal seat of Ermland, makes it probable that, at least in later life, he had entered the priesthood.”²
3. When sought for advice about how to reform the calendar, Copernicus at first demurred to answer, but later wrote a series of letters to Pope Paul III containing accurate observations which “actually served, seventy years later, as a basis for the working out of the Gregorian calendar.”³
4. For a long time Copernicus refused to publish his beliefs on a heliocentric universe. Finally, in 1531, he published a brief abstract, stating his theory in seven axioms. From this, the concept spread rapidly.
5. Two years later, Albert Widmanstadt lectured on the Copernican model before Pope Clement VII, an action for which he was rewarded.
6. In 1536, Cardinal Schonberg, who was Archbishop of Capua, urged Copernicus to fully publish his theory or, at the least, have a copy made at the Cardinal’s expense.
7. Between 1539 and 1541, a 66-page letter and a preliminary chapter were published and distributed.
8. As Copernicus explained in a letter to Pope Paul III, he finally yielded to the insistent urging of Cardinal Schonberg, Bishop Giese of Culm, and other knowledgeable men, and agreed to submit his manuscripts for publication. A completed, published copy of his book was placed in Copernicus’ hands just hours before his death on May 24, 1543.

It is important to note that Copernicus’ theory of a heliocentric universe was well known to the upper levels of the Catholic Church in his lifetime. While Copernicus preferred to publish his theories after his death, it was at the persistent entreaties of high-ranking church officials that he finally agreed to publish his manuscripts. Furthermore, it was not the Catholics who initially rejected his views, but Martin Luther, Philip Melancthon and other Protestant leaders. Catholics themselves admit: “Opposition was first raised against the Copernican system by Protestant theologians for Biblical reasons.”⁴

Question: why would Roman Catholic leaders persistently pressure Copernicus to publicize his theories of a heliocentric universe, theories for which they condemned Galileo less than 100 years later?

The answer is complicated, but reveals the motivation for what became a vast Jesuit conspiracy: it was necessary to change the public conception from an accurate understanding of the shape of the earth to a false belief so people would be more susceptible to the final delusion of an “alien” invasion.

Hegelian Dialectic

The Hegelian Dialectic is a tool used by governments and various change agents to influence public thinking and bring about a desired change. Simply put, a problem is artificially created. This problem draws out a pre-determined response. The response is then used to produce the desired solution.

Almost all major events in history employ the Hegelian Dialectic of: Problem – manufacture a crisis or take advantage of one already in place in order to get the desired Reaction of public outcry whereby the public demands a Solution which has been predetermined from the beginning.⁵ 

The Catholic hierarchy was presented with a perfect opportunity to lay the groundwork for a worldwide deception to bear fruit in the final generation. The deception required a small, globe earth, spinning through vast, limitless reaches of space, a space inhabited by aliens and other sentient life forms. This created doubt in the Bible as the inspired Word of Yahuwah, for the Bible presents the earth as unmoving. It also removed the Creator far away from His creation by presenting a universe unimaginably vast. The change agent to engineer this transformation in belief was the newly created Society of Jesus, commonly known as the Jesuits.