Can G-d have a G-d?

The King James Version (KJV) is mostly used in these lessons. Click here to access the KJV online.

Answer: There is only one G-d in the Bible. Would it ever make sense to say that G-d has a G-d? Of course it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to say G-d has a G-d. It's absurd to say G-d has a G-d. G-d, by definition, has no G-d. He is above all and greater than all.

Deu 6:4  "Hear, O Israel! Yahuwah is our G-d, Yahuwah is one!

Mar 12:32  And the scribe said unto him, Well, Master, thou hast said the truth: for there is one G-d; and there is none other but he:

Gal 3:20  Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but G-d is one.

If G-d had a G-d then his G-d would be someone else and you will necessarily end up with two G-ds where one of these G-ds is a G-d of the other. It's a ludicrous proposition not found in the Bible. Consider these verses:

Mat 27:46  And about the ninth hour Yahushua cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My G-d, my G-d, why hast thou forsaken me?

Was that G-d the Son calling out to his G-d? G-d's G-d? No!
Did G-d think that his G-d had forsaken Him? No!

Joh 20:17  Yahushua saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my G-d, and your G-d.

Did G-d the Son say that He, G-d, was ascending to his G-d? G-d's G-d?

Rev 3:12  Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my G-d, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my G-d, and the name of the city of my G-d, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my G-d: and I will write upon him my new name.

Was G-d the Son referring to His G-d? G-d's G-d? No!

Eph 1:17  That the G-d of our Lord Yahushua Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of him:

Is Paul referring to G-d's G-d? No. There is just one G-d, the Father Yahuwah, and there is no other G-d. And we have one mediator, the man Yahushua Christ:

1Ti 2:5  For there is one G-d, and one mediator between G-d and men, the man Christ Yahushua;

Gal 3:20  Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but G-d is one.

Heb 12:22  But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living G-d, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,

Heb 12:23  To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to G-d the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

Heb 12:24  And to Yahushua the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.

Conclusion: There is only one G-d and the idea of "G-d having his G-d" or "G-d the Son having the Father as his G-d" is not biblical nor does it make any sense. There is no such thing as "G-d the Son", because we have just one G-d, the Father.