Help is requested! The founder of this humble ministry hereby pledges to Father Yahuwah to give at least ½ half of his wealth to the poor, orphans, and widows. But he can’t carry out this task alone. He badly needs the help of other non-denominational truth-seekers to go about this undertaking. If you are burdened and convicted by Yah’s Spirit to play a part in this mission by contributing time and talent, please let us know. Click this banner for more info.
Join Now

JOIN TODAY!

Meet new people from all over the world, make friends, change your status, upload photos, earn points, & so much more! Chat, post comments or questions on our forum, or send private emails to your friends! There is so much to do and Learn here at World's Last Chance! Join our growing Christian Community Today and receive your Free Gift!

or sign in with your account below:
Tweets liked by ‎@WLC_Team
For Christ preached to the spirits in prison, who formerly were disobedient, when once the Divine longsuffering wai… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Oct 16, 2021
Paul clearly identified the resurrection from the grave as the ultimate and only source of hope and comfort for eve… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Oct 08, 2021
worldslastchance.com/biblical-chris… When Edison was asked how it felt to fail so often with the creation of the lightbulb, Edi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sep 24, 2021
Multitudes of Christians struggle and get discouraged over the fact that, no matter how much they strive to resist… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Sep 17, 2021
The Bible The Good News About the Old Covenant! Read more here! worldslastchance.com/biblical-chris…
Sep 03, 2021
John 11 is intriguing due to its powerful truths about death. If more people truly examined what is said in the det… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Aug 29, 2021
"If, then, dead books may be committed to flames, how much more live books, that is to say, men?" - Matthieu Ory, I… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Aug 20, 2021
To surrender to logical nonsense is the hallmark of deception as experienced by Eve. I am referring to the proposit… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Aug 14, 2021
2 Cor. 5:8 is commonly used to teach that at death a Christian transcends this world to be with Yahushua in a bodil… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Aug 08, 2021
How, when, and in who's name should we be baptized? worldslastchance.com/winds-of-doctr…
Jul 24, 2021
Did Isaiah, the greatest and most eloquent of the Hebrew writing prophets, see Yahushua in his lifetime as we read… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 17, 2021
When did Yahuwah's Son come into existence? This is a question many people just brush aside. Take it head on in thi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jul 02, 2021
People who find it difficult to accept the miracles of the Old Test. may also find it difficult to believe that Yah… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jun 26, 2021
Have you ever asked your parents why they do something to have them answer, "It's just tradition"? Take this story:… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jun 19, 2021
“The main thing is to keep the main thing the main thing.” But is the modern church doing that? Find out here:… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jun 04, 2021
The first of all the commandments is: Hear, O Israel! Yahuwah our God, Yahuwah is One. And you are to love Yahuwah… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 21, 2021
While the Kingdom of Yahuwah was the central theme of all preaching in the New Testament, it has been virtually ign… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 14, 2021
And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Yahushua Christ whom You have sent. (John… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 08, 2021
Seal Of YAH: Promise of Protection! Click link! Sabbaths, New Moons, & Feasts A precious spiritual gift available t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Apr 23, 2021
worldslastchance.com/view-video/267… Understanding the Creator’s Calendar ❤️ #Biblical #calendar #endtimes
Apr 17, 2021

eCourses Completion Status

1 Corinthians 8:6 (Part #2) | Exposing the False Trinity Doctrine

The King James Version (KJV) is mostly used in these lessons. Click here to access the KJV online.
Click here to start the quiz

4. One Lord/G-d and One Lord/G-d = Two G-ds

What the Trinitarian response argument is essentially suggesting is that Paul really meant, "for us there is one Lord G-d, the Father.... and one Lord G-d, Yahushua Christ. Trinitarians want to have the word "Lord" to be just another label for the one "G-d" just as the word "G-d" is a reference to the one G-d. However, if you just stop and think about it, this doesn't make any sense whatsoever. IF that were the case, Paul would be effectively saying there is one Lord G-d, the Father.... and one Lord G-d, Yahushua Christ. That necessarily amounts to two G-ds. One plus One is Two. If we have "one" of these and "one" of those it amounts to two things. Trinitarians like to say, "there is one G-d: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit." But Paul did not say, "there is one G-d, the Father.... and Yahushua." Since Trinitarians want "G-d" and "Lord" to be different titles for the same identity, G-d, he has Paul saying there is one G-d who is the Father and one G-d who is Yahushua Christ for a sum total of two G-ds.

The Definition of the word "G-d" in this Verse

How does the Trinitarian define the word "G-d" in this verse? Indeed, how does he define the words "one G-d." This term cannot be defined as the Triune G-d because that would be saying the Triune being is the Father which makes no sense in Trinitarian doctrine. Hence, the Trinitarian's only option is to try and claim it means "the one divine ousia," the divine nature. And indeed he must since there is no other option. Paul is referring to the "one G-d" and the oneness of G-d in Trinitarian doctrine is the divine ousia.

And this is where the Trinitarian is caught in an unsolvable predicament. He needs to have the words "G-d" and "Lord" be references to the divine nature. So here Paul would be defining the one divine nature as the one person of the Father and the one (same) divine nature (Lord) as the person of the Son. But this doesn't work in their doctrine. Doing such a thing would confuse person and being by granting identity to the divine nature which they claim they do not do. They would be ascribing identity to the divine nature and turning the what into a who. So this claim is also proven false. Not only so, it is clear that the word "G-d" and "Lord" are references to identities not natures since Paul is contrasting our one G-d, the Father, with the many G-ds of the pagans, and our one Lord, Yahushua, with many lords of the pagans. Moreover, if they word "G-d" was a reference to the divine nature, Paul would be identifying this divine nature ("G-d") as the Father. That would mean the Trinitarian Yahushua's divine nature is the Father. Absurd even in Trinitarian doctrine.

But if one loves G-d, he is known by HIM. Hence, as to the eating of idol sacrifices, we know that an idol is nothing and that there is no G-d but one. For although there may be G-ds in heaven or on earth, as there are many G-ds and many lords, yet for us there is one G-d, the Father, out of whom are all things and we to HIM, and one Lord, Yahushua Christ, through whom are all things and we through him.

The one G-d we love is our Father, the G-d of Yahushua. The word "G-d" and the word "Lord" are obviously references to identity, not nature.

5. The Structure of the Passage

The Trinitarian error can also be clearly seen when the context is honestly considered:

There is no G-d but One

Many G-ds

Many lords

Yet for Us

One G-d - the Father

Out of whom are all things and we to Him

and

One Lord - Yahushua Christ

Through whom are all things and we through him

Paul is contrasting many G-ds with our one G-d AND he is contrasting many Lords with our one Lord.

Although there are

For us there is

many G-ds

one G-d - the Father

and

and

many lords

one Lord - Yahushua Christ

We have one G-d in contrast to many G-ds. We do not have one G-d in contrast to many Lords. We do not have one Lord in contrast to many G-ds either. We have one Lord in contrast to many Lords. It is very important to see this parallel in Paul's argument. There are many G-ds but we have one G-d. AND there are many Lords but we have one Lord.

Some have many G-ds PLUS many lords. Christians have one G-d PLUS one Lord (Two).

5. King of Kings and Lord of Lords

In Scripture, there are many Lords (kyrios) identified including Abraham, Saul, David, Solomon, and Paul. The title "Lord of Lords" is an easy and simple way to see that there is not just one Lord in existence. If it were true that there was only one Lord in existence, and the Lords did not exist, the title "Lord of Lords" would be a very empty title. So we see in Scripture that there are indeed "many Lords" as Paul said at 1 Corinthians 8:4. There several Scriptural facts which demonstrate the Trinitarian claim is based on false premises. "Lordships" were created for example (Col 1:16). David is profusely called "Lord" at 1 Kings chapter one and Israelites are bowing down (proskyneo) before him as their Lord, "David our Lord." The Trinitarian response to 1 Corinthians 8:6 is entirely based on suggesting only one Lord exists. They do this because they need to claim that if only Lord exists then the Father is necessarily that one Lord in view because they also want to claim, by an act of their own will, that Yahushua is that one G-d of 1 Corinthians 8:6 despite the fact that Paul has already identified the one G-d as the Father. But the claim that only one Lord exists is demonstrably false.

The word "Lord" in this verse is Greek kyrios. The Shema command at Deuteronomy 6:4 says, "the Lord (kyrios) our G-d, the Lord (kyrios) is one." But King David was Israel's Lord (kyrios). So must we conclude that David is the Lord our G-d? No, and this illustrates the Trinitarian error concerning 1 Corinthians 8:6).
 


The above lesson was extracted from the links below which may have more details: