Galatians!
If Peter the Jew and a disciple of Yahushua found it difficult at times to understand the writings of Paul, is it surprising then to find the anti-Torah 'Christian' ministers base their position on their faulty understanding of Galatians? Even amongst the Torah-observant community, there is a lack of clarity on Paul's intended message. We praise Father Yahuwah for using Brother Tom Martincic to provide the clearest interpretation of Paul's message. Click here to listen to these 5 episodes, and we recommend listening to them in their given order. You will never again be confused about the subject of circumcision. WE ARE OVERJOYED & MOST THANKFUL TO YAHUWAH's HOLY SPIRIT FOR HELPING US COMPREHEND The GALATIAN MESSAGE.
Join Now

JOIN TODAY!

Meet new people from all over the world, make friends, change your status, upload photos, earn points, & so much more! Chat, post comments or questions on our forum, or send private emails to your friends! There is so much to do and Learn here at World's Last Chance! Join our growing Christian Community Today and receive your Free Gift!

or sign in with your account below:
Tweets liked by ‎@WLC_Team
Few on earth accept Yahushua as a legitimate human being - with a core human center and personality. The NT church… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 20, 2022
All Scripture is profitable for doctrine . . . (2 Tim. 3:16), but many Christians today have forgotten some very im… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 13, 2022
Spirits in Prison! Mythology is sometimes an embroidered account of real history. In this case, it aptly describes… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
May 06, 2022
Does the Shema support the Trinity doctrine? worldslastchance.com/winds-of-doctr…
Apr 29, 2022
Is Yahushua the only "Christ" in the Bible? The majority will surely respond with a resounding, "Yes!" However, the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Apr 22, 2022
Many people assume that the "feasts" were given only to the Israelites. However, these sacred times are holy annive… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Apr 15, 2022
The WLC team is seeking the help of the community in a very important matter. It is our sincere prayer that you can… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Apr 08, 2022
"Hear, O Israel! Yahuwah our Elohim is one!" This was the creed of Yahushua, but is it YOUR creed? Here are some ha… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Apr 01, 2022
In his constant preaching, as demonstrated in 1 Corinthians 15 and in the Thessalonian correspondence, Paul clearly… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 25, 2022
How it is that the true gospel of the coming Kingdom of Yahuwah can actually change lives? How is it that this part… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 18, 2022
18/We praise Yahuwah 4 having led us to a clearer understanding of the MT, and for not allowing us to stumble over… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
17/Certainly not. When we understand clearly that the ‘atonement’ does not only mean purging from sin, but also the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
16/Hebrews 10:4 states "it is impossible for the blood of bulls & goats to take away sins." Yet, Levitical sacrific… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
15/Likewise, to ignore Ez 40-48 b/c it references the establishment of animal sacrifices to provide atonement & cer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
14/What we may think about the Trumpets will not change the Father’s plan regarding the sounding of these Trumpets.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
13/Very few professed followers of Yahuwah believe in the end time events revealed to us in book of Revelation, esp… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
12/It is most foolish not to take the Bible literally. Yahuwah means what He says & says what HE means. As obedient… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 05, 2022
Yahushua was brought into existence by Yahuwah in a fabulously unique way. What confidence all of this should inspi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Mar 04, 2022
18/We praise Yahuwah 4 having led us to a clearer understanding of the MT, and for not allowing us to stumble over… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Feb 18, 2022
17/Certainly not. When we understand clearly that the ‘atonement’ does not only mean purging from sin, but also the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Feb 18, 2022

eCourses Completion Status

200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball! | Proof 131-140

The King James Version (KJV) is mostly used in these lessons. Click here to access the KJV online.
Click here to start the quiz

Click here to view "200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball!" with images.

Proof 131: NASA and modern astronomy maintain that the Moon is a solid, spherical, Earth-like habitation which man has actually flown to and set foot on. They claim the Moon is a non-luminescent planetoid which receives and reflects all its light from the Sun. The reality is, however, that the Moon is observably not a solid body, it is clearly circular, but not spherical, and not in any way an Earth-like planetoid which humans could set foot on. In fact, the Moon has been proven largely transparent and completely self-luminescent, shining with its own unique light.

Proof 132: The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay. This proves that Sun and Moon light are different, unique, and opposites as they are in the geocentric flat model.

Proof 133: In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the "Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon's rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees. So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties.

Proof 134: Furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light. Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection.

Proof 135: Not only is the Moon clearly self-luminescent, shining its own unique light, but it is also largely transparent. When the waxing or waning Moon is visible during the day it is possible to see the blue sky right through the Moon. And on a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it is even possible to occasionally see stars and “planets” directly through the surface of the Moon! The Royal Astronomical Society has on record many such occurrences throughout history which all defy the heliocentric model.

Proof 136: Many people think that modern astronomy’s ability to accurately predict lunar and solar eclipses is a result and proof positive of the heliocentric theory of the universe. The fact of the matter however is that eclipses have been accurately predicted by cultures worldwide for thousands of years before the “heliocentric ball-Earth” was even a glimmer in Copernicus’ imagination. Ptolemy in the 1st century A.D. accurately predicted eclipses for six hundred years on the basis of a flat, stationary Earth with equal precision as anyone living today. All the way back in 600 B.C. Thales accurately predicted an eclipse which ended the war between the Medes and Lydians. Eclipses happen regularly with precision in 18 year cycles, so regardless of geocentric or heliocentric, flat or globe Earth cosmologies, eclipses can be accurately calculated independent of such factors.

Proof 137: Another assumption and supposed proof of Earth’s shape, heliocentrists claim that lunar eclipses are caused by the shadow of the ball-Earth occulting the Moon. They claim the Sun, Earth, and Moon spheres perfectly align like three billiard balls in a row so that the Sun’s light casts the Earth’s shadow onto the Moon. Unfortunately for heliocentrists, this explanation is rendered completely invalid due to the fact that lunar eclipses have happened and continue to happen regularly when both the Sun and Moon are still visible together above the horizon! For the Sun’s light to be casting Earth’s shadow onto the Moon, the three bodies must be aligned in a straight 180 degree syzygy, but as early as the time of Pliny, there are records of lunar eclipses happening while both the Sun and Moon are visible in the sky. Therefore the eclipsor of the Moon cannot be the Earth/Earth’s shadow and some other explanation must be sought.

Proof 138: Another favorite “proof” of ball-Earthers is the appearance from an observer on shore of ships’ hulls being obfuscated by the water and disappearing from view when sailing away towards the horizon. Their claim is that ships’ hulls disappear before their mast-heads because the ship is beginning its declination around the convex curvature of the ball-Earth. Once again, however, their hasty conclusion is drawn from a faulty premise, namely that only on a ballEarth could this phenomenon occur. The fact of the matter is that the Law of Perspective on plane surfaces dictates and necessitates the exact same occurrence. For example a girl wearing a dress walking away towards the horizon will appear to sink into the Earth the farther away she walks. Her feet will disappear from view first and the distance between the ground and the bottom of her dress will gradually diminish until after about half a mile it seems like her dress is touching the ground as she walks on invisible legs. Such is the case on plane surfaces, the lowest parts of objects receding from a given point of observation necessarily disappear before the highest

Proof 139: Not only is the disappearance of ship’s hulls explained by the Law of Perspective on flat surfaces, it is proven undeniably true with the aid of a good telescope. If you watch a ship sailing away into the horizon with the naked eye until its hull has completely disappeared from view under the supposed “curvature of the Earth,” then look through a telescope, you will notice the entire ship quickly zooms back into view, hull and all, proving that the disappearance was caused by the Law of Perspective, not by a wall of curved water! This also proves that the horizon is simply the vanishing line of perspective from your point of view, NOT the alleged “curvature” of Earth.

Proof 140: Foucault’s Pendulums are often quoted as proof of a rotating Earth but upon closer investigation prove the opposite. To begin with, Foucault’s pendulums do not uniformly swing in any one direction. Sometimes they rotate clockwise and sometimes counter-clockwise, sometimes they fail to rotate and sometimes they rotate far too much. The behavior of the pendulum actually depends on 1) the initial force beginning its swing and, 2) the balland-socket joint used which most-readily facilitates circular motion over any other. The supposed rotation of the Earth is completely inconsequential and irrelevant to the pendulum’s swing. If the alleged constant rotation of the Earth affected pendulums in any way, then there should be no need to manually start pendulums in motion. If the Earth’s diurnal rotation caused the 360 degree uniform diurnal rotation of pendulums, then there should not exist a stationary pendulum anywhere on Earth!


Source: 200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball! (Eric Dubay)