Winds of Doctrine

Either the dead are dead, or they are not dead. They cannot be both dead and alive in heaven. The truth is plain and straightforward once we step back from tradition and allow the Scriptures to speak for themselves.

Humphreys, the “historian” at http://www.jesusneverexisted.com tries to make the case that Yahushua never existed and that the Christian message was nothing unique or new. How valid is this assertion?

It is taught by trinitarianism that Yahushua pre-existed and was incarnated into a "God-man," but the incarnation never happened. Yahushua did not pre-exist.

There is much about "The Chosen" that should concern the sincere Christian. Let’s look at examples of how this show twists Scripture and demeans Christ.

The doctrine of infallibility, while not what many Protestants have assumed, is still a problematic teaching.

Many Trinitarians believe that Yahushua’s prayer in the Gospel of John 17:5 shows that he pre-existed. But is this really what he was saying?

The supersessionist story goes, the true Israel is no longer Jewish Israel but the church which has accepted Yahushua, made up of gentiles and Jews alike. Is this true?

The purpose of this article is to examine whether groupings of three in Scripture or in nature point to a triune God. Is it true that mentioning three things together proves a trinity? Does grouping three things or people together create a “three-in-one” unity?

Daniel’s “seventy weeks” prophecy was fulfilled in the first century. Sadly, though, many today have failed to recognize this wonderful truth and insist that the final week of Daniel’s prophecy has not yet been fulfilled. Here are 5 proofs that Daniel’s 70th week has been fulfilled.

Did Yahushua and the Apostles tell us the whole story? Why did it take over 300 years for the Church to discover the Way of Salvation?

It is time many more Christians read their Bibles and summoned up the courage for Truth's sake rather than silence for unity.

Here, we examine the Trinity doctrine fallacy and some of the nonsensical assertions used to prop it up.

Nine questions for those who teach that Yahushua pre-existed his birth in Bethlehem...

Believers in the pre-existence of the Lord Yahushua often appeal to the words of the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 10:4, where he says of the Israelites in the wilderness that they "all drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank of that spiritual rock that followed them; and that rock was Christ." It is argued from this that Christ himself personally accompanied the people of Israel as they journeyed through the wilderness to the Promised Land. But is this really what Paul is saying?

Is Yahushua the only “Christ” in the Bible? The majority will surely respond with a resounding, “Yes!” However, the correct answer might surprise you. Read more!

Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that Yahushua is Michael the Archangel. I approach this topic with care and respect for those who hold to this doctrine; nevertheless, the aim of this study is to call their attention to the problems that one faces when trying to defend this doctrine.

Yahushua from the beginning claimed to be the promised Messiah. He never claimed to be Yahuwah, the God of Israel (who is also the God of Yahushua!). He never claimed to be “The Great I AM” of the OT. He did, however, repeatedly claim to be the unique Son of Yahuwah.

Can all true believers speak in tongues?

11 Biblical proofs of that Yahuwah (the Father) and Yahushua (the son) are not the same being.

Let's look at a few of the Scriptures which are alleged in support of the any-moment coming and to show that none of them can fairly be used to say, “Yes, the Apostles did believe that Christ could come at any moment.”