The Prologue to John’s Gospel
The article goes in some depth into John’s prologue. We think you will find it helpful in your explanation of what John really intended when he spoke of the word, not the “Word,” as if the Word meant the Son in John 1:1. The Son is what the word became (v. 14), not one to one equivalent to the word. The Son came into existence when the word was made flesh. This will harmonize John beautifully with Matthew’s and Luke’s view of how the Son began to exist.
Believing Yahushua’s Gospel
To believe the gospel is to be saved; not to believe the gospel is to be condemned. To believe the Son is to have everlasting life; not to believe the Son is not to have life but come under the wrath of Yahuwah. Clearly, then, what one believes or does not believe is an extremely important matter having consequences beyond this life. But what must one believe? What is Yahushua’s gospel? What is it to “believe in the Son”?
Power Under Authority
All our dealings with Yahuwah and all Yahuwah’s dealings with us are mediated through the one “authorized dealer” of spiritual things, the man approved of Yahuwah, Yahushua of Nazareth. The simplicity of our creed, as distinct from the hair-raising complexities of later Trinitarianism, which really destroy the agency principle, is worth repeating. May our children never forget that “There is one God, and one mediator between that God and man, the man Messiah Yahushua” (1 Tim. 2:5).
What Must I Do to Be Saved?
This thrilling piece of apostolic history contains the most important question that can be framed by human lips. It is not, What must I do to obtain health, or wealth, or fame, or some high position of human power and grandeur; but infinitely more than all these: “What must I do to be saved?”
Keep It Simple
Do you agree with Yahushua or is your loyalty to tradition? Christians must, by definition, have the same creed as Christ!
Losing Luke and Jumping to John
The most important question to be asked in relation to the Son of Yahuwah is about his origin. Where did he come from, how and when? There is a yawning chasm of difference between a person who has existed for eternity as eternal Yahuwah, before appearing as a human being, and one who begins to exist in the womb of his mother. A genuine human being must, by definition, begin to exist in his mother’s womb!
The Struggle of Scholars to Find the Triune God
Debunking the "Trinity" Doctrine: Theological literature and particularly evangelical apologetic writing in support of the Trinity attempts to make its case against an increasing volume of opposition from solid exegetical and lexical fact and the historical examination of the Bible.
How Plato Influenced Our View of Yahuwah
Many Christians sitting in the pew believe that their view of Yahuwah is derived solely from the Bible. They would never suspect, however, that the roots of their belief in a triune God comes, not from Scripture, but from Greek philosophy.
Christianity’s Platonic Heaven
The early Christian church was heavily influenced by Plato, and the effects of Plato’s teaching can still be seen within Christianity today. This is particularly true when it comes to the topic of heaven.
Questions Every Sincere Trinitarian/Binitarian Should Contemplate
Yahuwah is one. Yahushua, the Christ, is His only begotten human son. Contrary to popular belief, Scripture does not teach that Christ is the Creator, that the Father and Son are the same being, or that Yahushua existed prior to his birth in Bethlehem. Some thought-provoking questions for sincere truth seekers...
Melchizedek: The Once & Future King
The fact that Melchizedek was both priest and king while being fully human teaches a very important lesson about Yahushua who, likewise, is both a king and a priest while still being fully human. Yahushua, like Melchizedek before him, was appointed to this high, holy office by Yahuwah Himself. This makes Yahushua’s priesthood superior to that of the Levitical priests who simply inherited it by virtue of their parentage.
John Calvin Killed Rival Theologians: Bad Bible Interpretation Justified It
John Calvin’s interpretation of the Bible justified the murder of his theological opponents. He himself did not cut off any heads or light any fires that burned human heretics alive, but John Calvin’s preaching from the Old and New Testaments claimed those capital punishments aligned with God’s interests. What lessons must we learn from this?